Posted by Ed on March 6, 2007, 7:54 pm http://www.townonline.com/billerica/opinion/x144053312 Editorial March 1 edition Their feelings are logical in a time climate change worries and spiking fuel costs have led to a search for alternative energy sources. There is also concern about rushing in on a project that at first glance looks good both as a solution to these problems as well as a potential revenue source. However, the key lies not in the emotions that can escalate around these issues, but in getting the facts. Residents want more than a friendly package such as the kind many received in the mail recently from DG Clean Power. But, the process also calls for public hearings, which carry little weight without public participation. To engage residents, officials should consider going above and beyond what the approval process requires. Such a major project is worthy of a larger forum, perhaps one in a town hall fashion, for residents of Tewksbury and Billerica – and for anyone who wants to learn more, or to support or to challenge or criticize the project. A Town Meeting article proposed by Finance Committee Al Ramos also provides another opportunity by which those elected to represent all 11 precincts can express their expectations that the proponents truly act as good neighbors and give something back. The proposal can also be viewed as an opportunity for everyone to reflect on levels of consumption, the quest for alternatives to energy sources with harmful or uncertain effects, and a shared responsibility for a healthy environment.
24.34.144.49
Fine Editorial from the Billerica Minuteman
Thursday, March 01, 2007 - Updated: 12:12 PM EST
A proposal for a power plant anywhere – such as the so-called clean fuel plant proposed for a North Billerica site – can and should prompt questions, not only from neighbors but the local and state officials on whom residents depend to make sure all such projects are safe and appropriate.
Town residents, as well as those in nearby Tewksbury, are looking for answers, and many are skeptical.

Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread