Posted by Ed on March 12, 2007, 2:01 am It looks like all of our efforts in battling Birchwood’s Attorney’s, wear down tactics, pathetic traffic studies, misinformation campaign, and the alert planning board members who took the time to listen to all our “Public Safety” concerns, the Conservations Commissions “Environmental” concerns and concerns of the “Public at Large” will come down to the Land Court decision along with who will have the best attorney’s. This is a prime example of why 40B housing and the fallacy of 55+ housing must be reformed immediately on Beacon Hill. If not our qualified town boards will continuously operate like they are being held hostage! No date was mentioned for the court appearance but “Hinckley,Allen,Snyder, LLP All of us who sacrificed our personal time to enlighten the board of the arbitrary, capricious, legally untenable way the Attorney and Birchwood Development presented their project, not to mention how they also attempted to exceeded their authority, and therefore should be subjected to investigation by the proper authorities, which we all personally witnessed, will need to all pull together once again!!!! The only problem with my strong statement is the minutes of the meetings in the town of Billerica are not all officially recorded. So the taxpayer’s also need to request a warrant article to be submitted at town meeting to have all meetings recorded to prevent the possible travesty of our well qualified board’s decision being annulled by the arrogance of Corporations who wish to proceed in an arbitrary, capricious, legally untenable and who exceeded their authority fashion, from ever happening again! Some of the comments we all heard need to be put on official record so investigations may be requested!!!!! Questions:
24.34.144.49
This is not a test! This is an actual warning from the GREED broadcasting system!!! A Certified Complaint was filed at the town clerks office dated March 8, 2007.
Re: Arturo J. Gutierrez, Trustee, Birchwood Development, Inc. v. Paul Marcuso
Middlesex County, Land Court
Compliant
Attorneys at Law filed the complaint with the town.
Stating: “The Plaintiff’s assert that the Board’s decision was, arbitrary, capricious, legally untenable and exceeded its authority, and therefore should be annulled.”
Without official records of these meeting I am just blowing “hot air” and all statements will be denied!
Who will be representing our town?
Any suggestions on how to proceed?
Message Thread:
« Back to thread