Women who knew him, knew he was married. When they joined him in a private place (his hotel room or whatever) for a drink or social interaction alone with him,they knew that such behavior was not platonic (based on his reputation) nor was it high end. They, like he, were "cheating". They went voluntarily and we're not forced to go. Some of them may have also liked the idea that he had access to drugs.
If they had nonconsensual sex, called rape, that was wrong and they didn't deserve that. Rape, if shown to have occurred should be punished whenever possible
But, with knowledge of his marriage, of his habit of sexual appetite for other women, of their going to his private room and maybe partaking booze and drugs, were they so immature as to think this was not a problem. I repeat, rape is not permitted, no way. But are they blameless?
If I walk into a room of Crips or Bloods and use my freedom of speech to tell them what I think of them, I should not be physically attacked. But am blameless?
When one goes into a private place, with a married person who has a reputation, or a married person does that with someone, can one not understand that the reputation is known for a reason..
No person should be raped or assaulted...but sometimes one remembers the saying, "fools rush in where angels fear to tread". I think these women were fools and certainly not Angels. Rape they do not deserve. But shame on them for their behavior.
Message Thread
« Back to index