[ Post a Response | TALKinPACKERS message board ]
Re: Position of NON-Need
Posted by Scott on 4/17/2017, 9:45 pm, in reply to "Re: Position of NON-Need"
I agree with Howard at TE and whomever said if those two WR fall. Howard would create a logjam at TE, but R. Rodgers isn't a #1, the other 2 are older, and Kendricks isn't above being upgraded. I actually would prefer WR because while Jordy, Adams, and Cobb are good, the Packers could use a young elite WR. Plus, I remember a certain 4th WR coming up big in the Super Bowl.