Well if you discredit a good performance because of a weak OL, do you also then discredit a bad performance because of a strong OL? I just think it should go both ways, either you discredit both or discredit neither.
That being said, I agree with you that they faced a weak OL... but they were also battling an offense that couldn't stay on the freaking field... which IMO does make it a bit impressive, because they had to stay on the field and keep doing it over and over, getting wore out.
Packers had 6 straight drives that were 6 plays or less including
Packers had 3 straight drives that were 4 plays
This does NOT include the drives that ended a half.
« Back to index