Now that being said, I'm not sure trading up in the first is the route I'd go (depending on the BPA). I'd prefer trading back into the second which requires less draft capital. Teams like Dallas, Kansas City and New Orleans all pick at the bottom of the second and are short on draft picks (5 picks, 6 picks, and 4 picks respectively).
Kansas City would be an ideal trade partner. They have a 1st, two 2nds, a 3rd, no 4th. If KC traded one of their 2nds (61 and 63) and the Packers traded their 3rd and one of their 4ths, it's pretty much an even trade in terms of draft value.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index