Posted by daniel
on March 10, 2009, 12:42 am
66.27.124.84
i read this article the other day and thought that it had to deal with business ethics also.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/world/europe/09bribery.html?scp=2&sq=romania&st=cse
But aren't doctors obligated by a different kind of oath to always treat those who are needy? the conflict here i think is that doctors don't see it that way, and just see it as a way to make more money. in a socialized country like romania, what then is the incentive to become a doctor if the pay is bad anyway? why not become a different profession and take the bribes then. if one becomes a doctor, isn't it to help people out in the first place?
86
Message Thread:
« Back to thread