Posted by emily on March 16, 2009, 12:12 am128.54.183.177 i don't understand the intuition behind this. is this assuming that the actions taken are direct orders? 102 Message Thread: "if we have no freedom, we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions" - emily March 16, 2009, 12:12 am Re: "if we have no freedom, we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions" - sinusoidallysane March 16, 2009, 1:17 am Re: "if we have no freedom, we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions" - emily March 16, 2009, 11:39 am « Back to thread
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Your Email: Subject: Message: By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject: