Posted by Dmrichie
![]()
on September 21, 2009, 3:54 pm, in reply to "Letcombe V Ciren Utd report"
193.122.30.2
okay admittedly, the match report maybe a little one sided... but we did have numerous chances to increase our lead during the game. Missing a couple of one on ones and lets also be honest until your skipper scored a decent goal you never really threatened at all.
More importantly for me, i crossed the ball for our third goal and didnt even get credit for it! Lyle did...
--Previous Message--
: I have never read such rubbish as the match
: report on the letcombe website
:
:
: http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/letcombe/?primary=senior&secondary=matchreports&team_id=1897&report_id=25447
:
: 1. If we (ciren) were so poor why was the
: score 3-2?
: it was down to numerous missed chances, we
: also didnt take all our opportunities
: inclduing a great chance to equalise at 1-0
:
: 2. lets talk about the goals letcombe
: scored.
: First goal was a handball so no complaints
: about the award of the penalty but there was
: a blatant handball missed by the lino in the
: build up which, had it been given, wouldnt
: have resulted in the penalty.
:
: The second goal was an own goal, free kick
: taken from half way loften into the box and
: skimmed off a defenders head into the bottom
: corner so again extremely fortunate.
:
: and thirdly a defensive msitake leaving
: midfielder unmarked in the box.
:
: So out of 3 goals this supposedly
: "great" letcombe team managed to
: break us down once from open play whereas we
: did it twice.
:
: Also, the loss of our centre back to a
: straight red card (was deserved) didnt help
: our cause but again, letcombe didnt manage
: to breach our "extremely poor"
: defence with an extra man.
:
: So a little bit of arrogance on letcombes
: part?
:
: If the score had been a smashing then its
: acceptable but when you have just scraped
: through then perhaps being a little more
: humble would be a good idea.
:
: After all, letcombe arent exactly setting
: the league alight.
:
134
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread