
Posted by me
![]()
on 11/5/2009, 8:15 pm, in reply to "Mike..............."
the point is , the interpretation of these standards leaves a lot to the imagination , kinda whatever fits the current need ....folks speaking on what is and isn't a black mask are clueless for the most part ,black mask is genetic , it's dominant and a dog can't be slightly , they are or they're not .... e-mail the professor , she provided her e-mail .... personally i think you need to see the dog , and understand what your looking at , that eliminates a lot of folks .... maybe tomorrow , i'll find you some pics of red/fawn and white bordeauxs , english mastiff and bullmastiff . black and white labs , neos and newfs ....... there's plenty of them , yet they don't seem to think they're black and white , or red and white .....they only come in SOLID colors including solid brindle . your standards really are a free for all ... that and all the throwback excuses for type really would make it easy to cross in whatever you needed ....


Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread