But no Rodgers doesn't seem to be a huge fan of all the motion and the motion makes it more complex for the rookies too, so maybe that's a factor.
I huge part of the wide zone plan is taking pressure off the QB (which normally puts it square on the RBs) and to be point blank, the Packers play callers have absolutely failed at that, as they have put almost all the pressure on Rodgers (and I still think that's why Rodgers chokes in the playoffs, because he puts all the pressure on himself instead of sharing the pressure load).
But yes, the OL, specifically the OL run blocking has been a disappointment this year... Packers have had some success running the ball, but that's mainly due to the RBs being play makers, the run blocking has been average at best.
Also, I'm sure they don't like saying this, and maybe they would disagree, but the wide zone is supposed to be a run first offense. It's all set up by the RB being a threat... and honestly, I don't remember a ton of recent RB swing passes which is normal associated with this offense. To get a RB one on one with a LB.
Usually LaFleur puts it another way, the goal is take pressure off the QB (well pressure isn't destroyed, it just has to go to someone else, whom does it go to? The RB... how do you get a team to stop focusing on the most valuable position (QB) to focus more on the RB? Get them the ball... a lot!) So the wide zone system is a get the ball to the RB a lot system, not nessarily runs, but get the ball to the RB.
And they simply haven't been doing that...
And just to be clear, while I've been complaining all year about their failures to get the ball to the RBs, I'm not nessarily complaining about that with the Titans game... the Titans defensive front kicked our offense front butt... that wasn't nessarily about getting the ball more for the RB issue. But through our this season, the Packers have at times successful ran the ball, and the play callers still got away from the run... that should be unacceptable in this scheme.
« Back to index