One of my favorite offseason exercises. The best way to determine the long term future of the franchise is to look at the guys on rookie contracts.

Compared to when I've done this in recent years, the Packers have a pretty good corp.

1. Tucker Kraft
2. Evan Williams
3. Edgerrin Cooper
4. Javon Bullard
5. Jayden Reed
6. Jordan Morgan
7. Lukas Van Ness
8. Devonte Wyatt
9. Matthew Golden
10. Dontayvion Wicks

Just missed the cut are Anthony Belton, Karl Brooks, Colby Wooden, Carrington Valentine, and Sayvion Williams.

The top 10, especially the top 5, is really really solid. Kraft, Williams, Cooper and Bullard all look like long term solutions at their respective positions. Kraft likely getting a contract extension this offseason, while Williams, Cooper and Bullard with two years left on their rookie deals.

I think the Packers want to get reed on a long-term deal, but they'd want him back at their price. I could see GB letting Reed hit the market, see what kind of offers he gets, and likely letting him walk.

Jordan Morgan, Lukas Van Ness and Devonte Wyatt all looking to get increased playing time in 2026. I'm not convinced any of them are great starters, but they're at least serviceable.

Golden I had to throw in because when he had the ball thrown his way, he looked really good. I just can't put him any higher because of the lack of production (not necessarily his fault).

I think Wicks is a good player but he needs to go to a different offense to reach his full potential. I think he could be a servicable WR2 or high end WR3. But in Green Bay he's not much more than a WR4.

I always fall for the gadgety R3 weapon the BG always drafts so I'm really excited to see how Savion Williams develops. But at this moment he's a KR and gadget OW. Can't wait to see how he progresses.

I hate not having Carrington Valentine on this list. Ryan Wood had a great comment in Valentine, saying "He tackles like a coverage corner, but the problem is he doesn't cover like a coverage corner." If there's someone who might suffer the most from the Gannon defense it might be Valentine. A defense predicated on rally and tackling isn't exactly what I want for Valentine.