I think my biggest issue/question mark is they still seem intent on Banks getting in as soon as they deem him 100% healthy. #1, even if they do wait until he's truly 100%, based on recent history I don't see him lasting long before going down again; #2, based on what we've seen of Banks' play, it just doesn't appear to me that he has much left in the tank. Honestly, if the only options are "stick with who they're playing" or "insert Banks", I would stick with who they're playing... at least you know 100% what you have and the likelihood of someone going down isn't anywhere near what it would be if you put Banks back in...

Also, while McCarren may be right about the RB doing more for the run game than the OL, I think there is a minimum standard of blocking/holes opening before ANY RB can do much of anything. Other than the TB and CHI games (who both came in with very poor and/or injured defensive fronts), I simply haven't seen it. The last game against Dallas, the RBs were either met in the backfield, or the 'trenches' were a completely solid wall of humanity with little to no gap for a RB to even think about exploiting. Unless you have a once-in-a-generation type back like a prime Barry Sanders (and Jacobs, good as he is, isn't that), it's just not gonna work.